[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] [RFC] Standardized code block keywords
From: |
Nick Dokos |
Subject: |
Re: [O] [RFC] Standardized code block keywords |
Date: |
Fri, 28 Oct 2011 22:18:32 -0400 |
Thomas S. Dye <address@hidden> wrote:
> And, revising the files before Worg updates the Org-mode it uses will
> break them, right?
Yup - they got to be done at the same time.
Nick
>
> Tom
>
> Nick Dokos <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > I'm trying to add a note to Worg hacks but before I push, I use my local
> > org setup to publish Worg locally and take a look at it (not entirely
> > reliable
> > since my org version is usually different from the real Worg one, but a
> > good indication of problems before they happen nevertheless). I ran into
> > a couple of problems.
> >
> > The first one is expected: I'm running with Eric's patch, so when
> > processing Worg/org-contrib/babel/examples/o18.org (Tom Dye's article on
> > Archaelogy in Oceania), I ran into #+srcname vs #+name problems: when
> > Eric's changes do go into org and the new org is used to publish Worg,
> > there is going to be some breakage. Actually, o18.org is the extent of
> > breakage that I saw, so it doesn't look too bad.
> >
> > But I also ran into a second (unrelated) issue. Here's a minimal example:
> >
> > * Conclusion
> >
> > #+begin_src latex
> >
> > #+end_src
> >
> > Exporting to html gives me the attached backtrace. But the underlying reason
> > is easy to demonstrate: if you C-c C-c on the empty source block, you get:
> >
> > ,----
> > | * Conclusion
> > |
> > | #+begin_src latex
> > |
> > | #+end_src
> > |
> > | #+results:
> > | #+END_LaTeX
> > | #+BEGIN_LaTeX
> > `----
> >
> > Nick
> >
> > Versions:
> > Org-mode version 7.7 (release_7.7.485.gcfed6.dirty)
> > GNU Emacs 24.0.90.2 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 2.22.0) of
> > 2011-10-27
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> Thomas S. Dye
> http://www.tsdye.com
>
- Re: [O] [RFC] Standardized code block keywords, (continued)
- Re: [O] [RFC] Standardized code block keywords, Giovanni Ridolfi, 2011/10/26
- Re: [O] [RFC] Standardized code block keywords, Daniel Bausch, 2011/10/26
- Re: [O] [RFC] Standardized code block keywords, Nick Dokos, 2011/10/26
- Re: [O] [RFC] Standardized code block keywords, Daniel Bausch, 2011/10/27
- Re: [O] [RFC] Standardized code block keywords, Eric Schulte, 2011/10/28
- Re: [O] [RFC] Standardized code block keywords, Eric Schulte, 2011/10/28
- Re: [O] [RFC] Standardized code block keywords, Nick Dokos, 2011/10/28
- Re: [O] [RFC] Standardized code block keywords, Eric Schulte, 2011/10/28
- Re: [O] [RFC] Standardized code block keywords, Nick Dokos, 2011/10/28
- Re: [O] [RFC] Standardized code block keywords, Thomas S. Dye, 2011/10/28
- Re: [O] [RFC] Standardized code block keywords,
Nick Dokos <=
- Re: [O] [RFC] Standardized code block keywords, Daniel Bausch, 2011/10/31
- Re: [O] [RFC] Standardized code block keywords, Eric Schulte, 2011/10/31
- Re: [O] [RFC] Standardized code block keywords, Eric Schulte, 2011/10/25
- Re: [O] [RFC] Standardized code block keywords, Daniel Bausch, 2011/10/26
- Re: [O] [RFC] Standardized code block keywords, Thomas S. Dye, 2011/10/26
- Re: [O] [RFC] Standardized code block keywords, Eric Schulte, 2011/10/26
- Re: [O] [RFC] Standardized code block keywords, Eric S Fraga, 2011/10/24
- Re: [O] [RFC] Standardized code block keywords, Darlan Cavalcante Moreira, 2011/10/24
- Re: [O] [RFC] Standardized code block keywords, Thorsten, 2011/10/21
- Re: [O] [ANN] BREAKING CHANGE -- removing #+BABEL file-wide property lines, Eric Schulte, 2011/10/20