[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Orgmode] Re: Question about searches (ultimately for agenda)
From: |
Matt Lundin |
Subject: |
[Orgmode] Re: Question about searches (ultimately for agenda) |
Date: |
Wed, 16 Dec 2009 07:02:54 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (darwin) |
Mueen Nawaz <address@hidden> writes:
> On 12/15/09 21:26, Matt Lundin wrote:
>> Provided DONE and RETURNED are inactive todos than the following should
>> suffice:
>>
>> C-a M Jack [RET]
>
> I think you meant C-c a M Jack [RET]
Yes indeed. I'm still practicing typing out the notation for
keybindings. I suppose that C-c a is such a quick maneuver that I
instinctively shorten its notation. :)
> It actually does filter out inactive TODO's, but I actually
> wanted to do C-c a m Jack [RET]. I don't want to limit the search to
> headlines that have a TODO state. I just want to exclude those that
> have DONE (or anything equivalent to it).
Ah yes. Now I see that this is indeed what you were requesting in the
original post. I suppose I need to brush up on basic logic as well. :)
There is a shortened tag search syntax for including or excluding TODO
states:
C-c a m [RET] Jack/-DONE-RETURNED
You could assign this a shortcut in using org-agenda-custom-commands
command to avoid having to type it repeatedly. I'm not aware if there is
a shorter way to indicate *all* inactive todo states in such a search.
Best,
Matt
- [Orgmode] Question about searches (ultimately for agenda), Mueen Nawaz, 2009/12/15
- [Orgmode] Re: Question about searches (ultimately for agenda), Matt Lundin, 2009/12/15
- [Orgmode] Re: Question about searches (ultimately for agenda), Mueen Nawaz, 2009/12/15
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: Question about searches (ultimately for agenda), Carsten Dominik, 2009/12/16
- [Orgmode] Re: Question about searches (ultimately for agenda), Mueen Nawaz, 2009/12/16
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: Question about searches (ultimately for agenda), Carsten Dominik, 2009/12/17
- [Orgmode] Re: Question about searches (ultimately for agenda), Mueen Nawaz, 2009/12/18
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: Question about searches (ultimately for agenda), Carsten Dominik, 2009/12/20
- [Orgmode] Re: Question about searches (ultimately for agenda),
Matt Lundin <=