[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Please check if GPM works as expected
From: |
Gerd Möllmann |
Subject: |
Re: Please check if GPM works as expected |
Date: |
Sun, 26 Jan 2025 06:48:19 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
Jared Finder <jared@finder.org> writes:
> Assuming this was just a mistake, perhaps it would make sense to alter
> tty_frame_at to take short int as parameters instead of int (with a
> bit of additional error checking, of course). An int is already
> truncating some fixnum values and I can't imagine a TTY with more than
> 16000 rows or columns.
I think we wouldn't win much by making them short ints. Maybe compiler
warnings :-).
- Please check if GPM works as expected, Gerd Möllmann, 2025/01/25
- Re: Please check if GPM works as expected, Gerd Möllmann, 2025/01/25
- Re: Please check if GPM works as expected, Gerd Möllmann, 2025/01/25
- Re: Please check if GPM works as expected, Eli Zaretskii, 2025/01/25
- Re: Please check if GPM works as expected, Gerd Möllmann, 2025/01/25
- Re: Please check if GPM works as expected, Jared Finder, 2025/01/25
- Re: Please check if GPM works as expected, Gerd Möllmann, 2025/01/25
- Re: Please check if GPM works as expected, Jared Finder, 2025/01/25
- Re: Please check if GPM works as expected, Gerd Möllmann, 2025/01/25
- Re: Please check if GPM works as expected, Jared Finder, 2025/01/26
- Re: Please check if GPM works as expected,
Gerd Möllmann <=
- Re: Please check if GPM works as expected, Eli Zaretskii, 2025/01/26
- Re: Please check if GPM works as expected, Jared Finder, 2025/01/26
- Re: Please check if GPM works as expected, Eli Zaretskii, 2025/01/27