[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: SQ: why transient instead of enhanced keymaps?
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: SQ: why transient instead of enhanced keymaps? |
Date: |
Mon, 13 Jan 2025 14:57:21 +0200 |
> Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2025 19:54:35 -0800
> From: Daniel Colascione <dancol@dancol.org>
>
> Transient is now an included battery that provides quick-access menus, mostly
> famously for magit. People
> love it. But the overall effect of including it is that we have two keymap
> systems, one of which, transient, isn't
> customizable the same way keymaps usually are. Why wasn't transient
> functionality provided by making
> keymaps better? I don't see why in principle they couldn't do the same things.
AFAICT, it never came up in the discussions we had about it:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2021-02/msg01384.html
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2021-04/msg00944.html
- SQ: why transient instead of enhanced keymaps?, Daniel Colascione, 2025/01/12
- Re: SQ: why transient instead of enhanced keymaps?,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: SQ: why transient instead of enhanced keymaps?, Karthik Chikmagalur, 2025/01/20
- RE: [External] : Re: SQ: why transient instead of enhanced keymaps?, Drew Adams, 2025/01/20
- Re: [External] : Re: SQ: why transient instead of enhanced keymaps?, Óscar Fuentes, 2025/01/21
- RE: [External] : Re: SQ: why transient instead of enhanced keymaps?, Drew Adams, 2025/01/21
- Re: SQ: why transient instead of enhanced keymaps?, Óscar Fuentes, 2025/01/21
- RE: [External] : Re: SQ: why transient instead of enhanced keymaps?, Drew Adams, 2025/01/21
- RE: [External] : Re: SQ: why transient instead of enhanced keymaps?, Karthik Chikmagalur, 2025/01/21
- Re: SQ: why transient instead of enhanced keymaps?, Karthik Chikmagalur, 2025/01/21
Re: SQ: why transient instead of enhanced keymaps?, Howard Melman, 2025/01/21