[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Proposal: A Get Started introduction to emacs [was: An anonymous IRC
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Proposal: A Get Started introduction to emacs [was: An anonymous IRC user's opinion] |
Date: |
Thu, 09 Jan 2025 17:38:25 +0200 |
> Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2025 13:59:23 +0000
> From: Moakt Temporary Email <3c633ed3bb1f@drmail.in>
>
> Hi Eli,
>
> I did not get a follow up on the “Get Started” introduction to emacs.
>
> By the way, I want to thank you for taking the time to read it. It took me
> some effort and time to write it, so I appreciate that.
>
> What is supposed to happen, so it can be added to emacs ?
>
> Do you want me to complete it (filling the empty dots) ?
>
> I wanted to do that initially, but I thought that you know emacs better than
> me, to choose the correct words, and I though that you would be
> reviewing/correcting it anyway, that is why I preferred keeping them empty.
> But I made an effort not to leave a lot, they are too few, and can be quickly
> filled.
Did you see my suggestions in this message:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2024-12/msg00532.html
Since we already have customization groups and commands to present
them and allow users to look for the group(s) they need and customize
the relevant aspects, I feel that improving our groups (which
currently look not very rational or even helpful). The next step
would be to support intersections of groups.
WDYT?