Re: Merging scratch/no-purespace to remove unexec and purespace

[Andrea Corallo]

Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:

>> Date: Sat, 04 Jan 2025 11:12:48 +0000
>> From: Pip Cet <pipcet@protonmail.com>
>> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, stefankangas@gmail.com, acorallo@gnu.org, 
>> gerd.moellmann@gmail.com, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca
>> 
>> "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>> 
>> > Is this about bug#74966?  If so, let's not discuss the same issue
>> 
>> No.  This is about the --enable-checking code treating --lambda-fixup as
>> a forbidden symbol and crashing if it is used in the obvious fashion by
>> any code that happens to be native-compiled, which is the current status
>> on scratch/no-purespace.
>
> Then I'd like to hear Andrea's opinion on this.

My opinion is that, to fix the scratch/no-purespace bug, I'm okay with
the #$ solution if it works.  Honestly I'd be fine also using a comp
specific symbol like comp--something which is documented not to be
compilable, maybe less nice but probably less convoluted.  Anyway if Pip
prefers #$ and is not too complex I'm okay with that.

  Andrea