[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [External] : Re: Please rename trusted-content to trusted-contents
From: |
Björn Bidar |
Subject: |
Re: [External] : Re: Please rename trusted-content to trusted-contents |
Date: |
Mon, 23 Dec 2024 02:31:54 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
Drew Adams <drew.adams@oracle.com> writes:
>> OK, I tried to figure it out, but at least the info I found wasn't
>> very definitive. It seems to have to do with whether it's countable or
>> not, or whether it describe the "conceptual ideas" contained as opposed
>> to the actual elements contained.
>
> Right. And the distinction isn't very important in
> practice, as the two are often used interchangeably
> (arguably incorrectly, but ... usage wins in the end,
> and who knows what verdict/measure the future will hold).
>
> Googling is helpful. This bit from one search hit
> isn't a bad overview:
>
> Thus, while a book has contents (sections, chapters,
> subchapters, etc.), the content of a book is the story
> it tells.
>
> * This is a brief summary of the contents of the book.
>
> * The title says one thing, but the content of the book
> is completely different.
>
> https://www.pristineword.com/noun-content-contents/
>
> "Content" is the meaning that's "contained", abstractly,
> in something. Something's "contents" are the actual
> things contained in it - the something is regarded only
> as a container.
I was thinking the same. Contents is wrong to me in this context.
as _the content_ by itself is already a multiple of something.
It is like writing peoples for multiple person when people
is already a multiple. Peoples similar the contents refers to
the persons inside people e.g. American Peoples Party.
But English in IMHO quite confusing when it comes to the s suffix and
not.
I can relate very much.
I regret not using a grammar checker sometimes..
> You might (sort of) think of this in terms of type
> versus constituent/instance. "Content" looks beyond
> the contained individuals to what they have in common,
> and thus to what they represent/mean collectively.
>
> * The contents of that directory are image files.
> It contains files.
>
> * The content of that directory is images (file type:
> image). That's the directory's purpose/meaning o.
- Re: Please rename trusted-content to trusted-contents, (continued)
- Re: Please rename trusted-content to trusted-contents, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/12/20
- Re: Please rename trusted-content to trusted-contents, Stefan Kangas, 2024/12/20
- Re: Please rename trusted-content to trusted-contents, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/12/20
- Re: Please rename trusted-content to trusted-contents, Stefan Kangas, 2024/12/21
- Re: Please rename trusted-content to trusted-contents, Stefan Monnier, 2024/12/21
- Re: Please rename trusted-content to trusted-contents, Stefan Monnier, 2024/12/21
- Re: Please rename trusted-content to trusted-contents, Morgan Willcock, 2024/12/22
- Re: Please rename trusted-content to trusted-contents, Stefan Monnier, 2024/12/24
- Re: Please rename trusted-content to trusted-contents, tomas, 2024/12/24
- RE: [External] : Re: Please rename trusted-content to trusted-contents, Drew Adams, 2024/12/22
- Re: [External] : Re: Please rename trusted-content to trusted-contents,
Björn Bidar <=
- Re: [External] : Re: Please rename trusted-content to trusted-contents, Richard Stallman, 2024/12/23
- Re: Please rename trusted-content to trusted-contents, Richard Stallman, 2024/12/22
- Re: Please rename trusted-content to trusted-contents, Björn Bidar, 2024/12/23
- Re: Please rename trusted-content to trusted-contents, Richard Stallman, 2024/12/24
- Re: Please rename trusted-content to trusted-contents, Stefan Monnier, 2024/12/24
- Re: Please rename trusted-content to trusted-contents, Richard Stallman, 2024/12/22