[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Reconsider defaults for use-package-vc-prefer-newest
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Reconsider defaults for use-package-vc-prefer-newest |
Date: |
Sat, 21 Sep 2024 10:14:20 +0300 |
> From: Philip Kaludercic <philipk@posteo.net>
> Cc: suhailsingh247@gmail.com, meedstrom@runbox.eu, emacs-devel@gnu.org,
> tonyzorman@mailbox.org
> Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2024 20:43:27 +0000
>
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>
> >> From: Philip Kaludercic <philipk@posteo.net>
> >> Cc: suhailsingh247@gmail.com, meedstrom@runbox.eu, emacs-devel@gnu.org,
> >> tonyzorman@mailbox.org
> >> Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2024 15:14:26 +0000
> >>
> >> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
> >>
> >> >> This is the fix:
> >> >
> >> > Can you explain in plain English what this does?
> >>
> >> Sure, each package has a description object (search for "(cl-defstruct
> >> (package-desc" in package.el), with some fixed attributes like name,
> >> version, dependencies and others that are stored in an alist. The
> >> commit used to create a package is one such attribute stored in the
> >> "extras" slot of a package-desc. My chance modifies the package
> >> description given by the ELPA server and updates the :commit field to
> >> store the commit that was checked out when the package was built
> >> locally. I hope that is clear enough?
> >
> > Yes, thanks. What was the :commit field storing before the change?
>
> The commit the ELPA build server used to release a new version of the
> package.
That is not right, I agree.
> M-x list-packages lists the commit of the local checkout for
> VC packages, btw.
What is "the local checkout" in this context?
> I could have sworn that M-x describe-package did the same.
Shouldn't they all be consistent in what commit they show?
- Re: Reconsider defaults for use-package-vc-prefer-newest, (continued)
- Re: Reconsider defaults for use-package-vc-prefer-newest, Philip Kaludercic, 2024/09/19
- Re: Reconsider defaults for use-package-vc-prefer-newest, Suhail Singh, 2024/09/20
- Re: Reconsider defaults for use-package-vc-prefer-newest, Philip Kaludercic, 2024/09/19
- Re: Reconsider defaults for use-package-vc-prefer-newest, Philip Kaludercic, 2024/09/19
- Re: Reconsider defaults for use-package-vc-prefer-newest, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/09/20
- Re: Reconsider defaults for use-package-vc-prefer-newest, Philip Kaludercic, 2024/09/20
- Re: Reconsider defaults for use-package-vc-prefer-newest, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/09/20
- Re: Reconsider defaults for use-package-vc-prefer-newest, Philip Kaludercic, 2024/09/20
- Re: Reconsider defaults for use-package-vc-prefer-newest, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/09/20
- Re: Reconsider defaults for use-package-vc-prefer-newest, Philip Kaludercic, 2024/09/20
- Re: Reconsider defaults for use-package-vc-prefer-newest,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Reconsider defaults for use-package-vc-prefer-newest, Philip Kaludercic, 2024/09/21
- Re: Reconsider defaults for use-package-vc-prefer-newest, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/09/21
- Re: Reconsider defaults for use-package-vc-prefer-newest, Philip Kaludercic, 2024/09/21
- Re: Reconsider defaults for use-package-vc-prefer-newest, Suhail Singh, 2024/09/20
- Re: Reconsider defaults for use-package-vc-prefer-newest, Philip Kaludercic, 2024/09/20
- Re: Reconsider defaults for use-package-vc-prefer-newest, Suhail Singh, 2024/09/21
- Re: Reconsider defaults for use-package-vc-prefer-newest, chad, 2024/09/21
- Re: Reconsider defaults for use-package-vc-prefer-newest, Suhail Singh, 2024/09/21
- Re: Reconsider defaults for use-package-vc-prefer-newest, Philip Kaludercic, 2024/09/21
- Re: Reconsider defaults for use-package-vc-prefer-newest, Suhail Singh, 2024/09/22