[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Reconsider defaults for use-package-vc-prefer-newest
From: |
Philip Kaludercic |
Subject: |
Re: Reconsider defaults for use-package-vc-prefer-newest |
Date: |
Fri, 20 Sep 2024 15:14:26 +0000 |
Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>> From: Philip Kaludercic <philipk@posteo.net>
>> Cc: Martin Edström <meedstrom@runbox.eu>, "emacs-devel"
>> <emacs-devel@gnu.org>, Tony Zorman <tonyzorman@mailbox.org>
>> Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2024 20:31:25 +0000
>>
>> >>> The current approach is to find the newest commit that touches a
>> >>> version header and use that.
>> >>
>> >> Would it be possible to reflect the commit corresponding to the version
>> >> in the "Other versions:" field in the output of M-x describe-package ?
>> >
>> > Why under "Other version:" (which links to other packages). IIRC the
>> > commit of a VC package should appear under the commit header. There is
>> > the possibility of using a symbolic name if available.
>> >
>> > I now notice that this is not the case as I had assumed... I'll try to
>> > fix it as soon as possible.
>>
>> This is the fix:
>
> Can you explain in plain English what this does?
Sure, each package has a description object (search for "(cl-defstruct
(package-desc" in package.el), with some fixed attributes like name,
version, dependencies and others that are stored in an alist. The
commit used to create a package is one such attribute stored in the
"extras" slot of a package-desc. My chance modifies the package
description given by the ELPA server and updates the :commit field to
store the commit that was checked out when the package was built
locally. I hope that is clear enough?
--
Philip Kaludercic on siskin
- Reconsider defaults for use-package-vc-prefer-newest, Martin Edström, 2024/09/14
- Re: Reconsider defaults for use-package-vc-prefer-newest, Philip Kaludercic, 2024/09/19
- Re: Reconsider defaults for use-package-vc-prefer-newest, Suhail Singh, 2024/09/20
- Re: Reconsider defaults for use-package-vc-prefer-newest, Philip Kaludercic, 2024/09/19
- Re: Reconsider defaults for use-package-vc-prefer-newest, Philip Kaludercic, 2024/09/19
- Re: Reconsider defaults for use-package-vc-prefer-newest, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/09/20
- Re: Reconsider defaults for use-package-vc-prefer-newest,
Philip Kaludercic <=
- Re: Reconsider defaults for use-package-vc-prefer-newest, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/09/20
- Re: Reconsider defaults for use-package-vc-prefer-newest, Philip Kaludercic, 2024/09/20
- Re: Reconsider defaults for use-package-vc-prefer-newest, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/09/20
- Re: Reconsider defaults for use-package-vc-prefer-newest, Philip Kaludercic, 2024/09/20
- Re: Reconsider defaults for use-package-vc-prefer-newest, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/09/21
- Re: Reconsider defaults for use-package-vc-prefer-newest, Philip Kaludercic, 2024/09/21
- Re: Reconsider defaults for use-package-vc-prefer-newest, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/09/21
- Re: Reconsider defaults for use-package-vc-prefer-newest, Philip Kaludercic, 2024/09/21
- Re: Reconsider defaults for use-package-vc-prefer-newest, Suhail Singh, 2024/09/20
- Re: Reconsider defaults for use-package-vc-prefer-newest, Philip Kaludercic, 2024/09/20