Re: Missing entries for Perl in etags-regen-file-extensions -- okay for emacs-30?

[Dmitry Gutov]

On 20/09/2024 22:35, Dmitry Gutov wrote:
> > > Adding "pm" sounds good.
> > >
> > > "All supported extensions" (or most) might be a good idea as well.
> >
> > So I think we should add all of them on emacs-30.
>
> I have no objections, if you're sure about misdetecion. Though note that 
> the current logic only supports specifying extensions. So no Makefile/ 
> Rakefile/etc.

Maybe do that on master, though.

Scanning for tags in files that aren't considered code like .html or 
.texi, etc might create a lot more navigation locations, not all of them 
wanted in 'C-u M-.' completion.

I'm not actually sure it will be a problem, but it seems like a major 
enough change to allow for user feedback first.