[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Installing cond* in core
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Installing cond* in core |
Date: |
Sun, 04 Feb 2024 22:33:40 -0500 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
Rewriting clause by clause is an interesting idea.
However, there are problems to solve.
> Throw away cond*-subpat. Just rewrite
cond* has extended the patterns.
This would discard those extensions, so I have to say no.
Rewriting using pcase could be acceptable if those extensions are
implemeted in pcase. You would be able to do that, if you want to.
> (cond*
> ((match* PAT FORM) THEN)
> . ELSE)
That method works for exiting match* clauses, and this
> (cond*
> ((match* PAT FORM))
> . REST)
for empty no-exit match* clauses, But there are also nonempty ni-exit
clauses:
> (cond*
> (:no-exit (match* PAT FORM) THEN)
> . ALWAYS)
Can rewriting handle that?
--
Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org)
Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org)
Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)
Re: Installing cond* in core,
Richard Stallman <=