|
From: | Dmitry Gutov |
Subject: | Re: Adding refactoring capabilities to Emacs |
Date: | Fri, 29 Sep 2023 20:20:46 +0300 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.13.0 |
On 29/09/2023 18:20, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2023 13:21:43 +0300 Cc: ams@gnu.org, joaotavora@gmail.com, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, philipk@posteo.net, emacs-devel@gnu.org From: Dmitry Gutov <dmitry@gutov.dev>Correction: C-x v v.That functionality of "C-x v v" is only available for Git (and basically is undocumented), so it's too early to declare victory.It's available for Git, for Hg (two separate dedicated implementations), and for the other VCSes too on best-effort basis (see the function vc-default-checkin-patch).Yes, I found this out by now, thanks. Which makes it even worse that no documentation of "C-x v v" mentions that, anywhere! (And many things that "C-x v v" did for years aren't documented, either, sigh.) We should do better than that.
We should. But the problem started at the "no feedback" step.When there is no interest even among the greybeards on this list, why spend extra effort advertising something untested?
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |