[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: New Package for NonGNU-ELPA: clojure-ts-mode
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: New Package for NonGNU-ELPA: clojure-ts-mode |
Date: |
Fri, 01 Sep 2023 14:07:46 +0300 |
> Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2023 12:49:48 +0300
> Cc: philipk@posteo.net, yantar92@posteo.net, luangruo@yahoo.com,
> stefankangas@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org
> From: Dmitry Gutov <dmitry@gutov.dev>
>
> On 01/09/2023 09:07, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> >> What I'm trying to say here is: Email might look like it's easy to use,
> >> but in the context of a mailing list it's not necessarily so, even from
> >> the technical side. These text entry boxes on Github et al. definitely
> >> feel easier and more inviting to use.
> > Yes, but the cost is that you need to proactively to visit each and
> > every GitHub repository to see whether something new was posted in the
> > subjects of your interest, and then refresh the page every so often.
>
> Not really. You visit every such repository once, then click "Watch" on
> the whole repo, or "Subscribe" to individual issues, and see
> notifications go into your email inbox whenever something happens (there
> are some granularity settings as well).
I know. But the "Watch" feature IME produces a lot of noise, and
there's no way AFAIK to be selective there. For example, I don't want
to see the "closed" and "merged" notifications, not machine-generated
links to commits, I only want to see discussions posted by humans.
In any case, this feature of GitHub is not relevant, because in this
sub-thread I was comparing the email-based workflow with the GitHub
one. That GitHub has a feature to deliver email is not relevant since
the message to which I responded in effect said "I don't want to use
email".
> Email is still very much a part of most people's work day.
Not according to the OP, no.
- Re: New Package for NonGNU-ELPA: clojure-ts-mode, (continued)
- Re: New Package for NonGNU-ELPA: clojure-ts-mode, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/09/03
- Re: New Package for NonGNU-ELPA: clojure-ts-mode, Po Lu, 2023/09/02
- Re: New Package for NonGNU-ELPA: clojure-ts-mode, Dmitry Gutov, 2023/09/02
- Re: New Package for NonGNU-ELPA: clojure-ts-mode, Po Lu, 2023/09/02
- Re: New Package for NonGNU-ELPA: clojure-ts-mode, Dmitry Gutov, 2023/09/02
- Re: New Package for NonGNU-ELPA: clojure-ts-mode, Dmitry Gutov, 2023/09/01
- Re: New Package for NonGNU-ELPA: clojure-ts-mode, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/09/01
- Re: New Package for NonGNU-ELPA: clojure-ts-mode, Dmitry Gutov, 2023/09/01
- Re: New Package for NonGNU-ELPA: clojure-ts-mode, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/09/01
- Re: New Package for NonGNU-ELPA: clojure-ts-mode, Dmitry Gutov, 2023/09/01
Re: New Package for NonGNU-ELPA: clojure-ts-mode,
Eli Zaretskii <=
Re: New Package for NonGNU-ELPA: clojure-ts-mode, Ihor Radchenko, 2023/09/01
Re: New Package for NonGNU-ELPA: clojure-ts-mode, Ihor Radchenko, 2023/09/01
- Re: New Package for NonGNU-ELPA: clojure-ts-mode, Po Lu, 2023/09/01
- Re: New Package for NonGNU-ELPA: clojure-ts-mode, Ihor Radchenko, 2023/09/01
- Re: New Package for NonGNU-ELPA: clojure-ts-mode, Po Lu, 2023/09/01
- Re: New Package for NonGNU-ELPA: clojure-ts-mode, Ihor Radchenko, 2023/09/01
- Re: New Package for NonGNU-ELPA: clojure-ts-mode, Po Lu, 2023/09/01
- Re: New Package for NonGNU-ELPA: clojure-ts-mode, Ihor Radchenko, 2023/09/01
- Re: New Package for NonGNU-ELPA: clojure-ts-mode, Po Lu, 2023/09/01