Re: built-in sqlite support in 29 - still time for changes?

[Lynn Winebarger]

On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 9:35 AM Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
> > From: Lynn Winebarger <owinebar@gmail.com>
> > Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2023 09:18:16 -0400
> >
> > *  Is the current code mature enough to document properly, or is that
> > being delayed until the implementation is more mature?
>
> I'm not sure I understand what do you mean by "document properly",
> since the SQLite support is already documented in the ELisp reference
> manual.

That's user error on my part.  Even though I was running my last built
version of master, the last version of emacs I built/installed was
28.3, so I was seeing the old manual.
Thanks

> (I have no opinion on the other issues you raise.)

Would patches still be accepted for emacs-29?  I don't know what the
cutoff is.  For the first point in particular, I don't know if the
emacsql convention is the best, but it seems gratuitous to change the
idiom unless there's a good reason.  It seems like emacsql query
compiler could be adapted to the builtin support with the advantage of
not being restricted to string values, so existing code could be
conveniently ported.


Lynn