emacs-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Merging feature/android


From: Arash Esbati
Subject: Re: Merging feature/android
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2023 12:59:06 +0100
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)

Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:

> This is unrelated to the feature branch, I see that on master as well,
> and asked Alan to look into that.

Thanks.  Another observation: When I run make on master, I see these
warnings:

  CC       atimer.o
  CC       doprnt.o
In file included from process.c:33:
In function 'SDATA',
    inlined from 'SSDATA' at lisp.h:1677:19,
    inlined from 'create_process' at process.c:2254:40,
    inlined from 'Fmake_process' at process.c:2059:7:
lisp.h:1671:31: warning: array subscript 0 is outside array bounds of 'char[]' 
[-Warray-bounds]
 1671 |   return XSTRING (string)->u.s.data;
      |          ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~
lisp.h:1671:31: warning: null pointer dereference [-Wnull-dereference]
  CC       intervals.o

and

  CC       w32inevt.o
  CC       w32proc.o
w32heap.c: In function 'getrlimit':
w32heap.c:853:14: warning: 'm' may be used uninitialized [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
  853 |         if (!VirtualQuery ((LPCVOID) &m, &m, sizeof m))
      |              ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from C:/msys64/mingw64/include/winbase.h:25,
                 from C:/msys64/mingw64/include/windows.h:70,
                 from w32common.h:24,
                 from w32heap.c:54:
C:/msys64/mingw64/include/memoryapi.h:45:28: note: by argument 1 of type 
'LPCVOID' {aka 'const void *'} to 'VirtualQuery' declared here
   45 |   WINBASEAPI SIZE_T WINAPI VirtualQuery (LPCVOID lpAddress, 
PMEMORY_BASIC_INFORMATION lpBuffer, SIZE_T dwLength);
      |                            ^~~~~~~~~~~~
w32heap.c:844:34: note: 'm' declared here
  844 |         MEMORY_BASIC_INFORMATION m;
      |                                  ^
  CC       w32image.o

Running make on the feature branch, I don't get them.  Does it mean that
Po Lu has kindly fixed them?

Best, Arash



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]