Re: Progress on merging Eglot?

[Philip Kaludercic]

João Távora <joaotavora@gmail.com> writes:

> Philip Kaludercic <philipk@posteo.net> writes:
>
>> In either case, the main problem is that the (908) commits in the
>> repository don't appear to be in the conventional changelog format,
>> and I don't think there is an easy way to automatically fix that.
>
> Can you point to examples?  And why do you say it's a "main problem"? 

I should have been more concrete, a lot of messages appear to reference
issues in the elgot issue tracker, that wouldn't make much sense in
emacs.git.

> Anyway I use and enforce the same format in both my Eglot and emacs.git
> commits, and I've never had big complaints about the format of the
> latter (that I remember).
>
> If you're concerned about the ChangeLog style
>
>   * eglot.el (foo): bar.
>
> Not making sense once eglot.el is in lisp/progmodes/eglot.el, then I
> don't think it's a problem.
>
> Also, rewriting all commits once is fine with me, as long as the long
> string of commits is preserved.
>
> João