Re: Tree-sitter api

[Lars Ingebrigtsen]

Yuan Fu <casouri@gmail.com> writes:

>>>> One thing that we should consider right now is the name-space.  You
>>>> used tree-sitter-* names for all the symbols, and I'm asking whether
>>>> we don't want something shorter, like ts-*.  This is a decision we
>>>> must make now, because once we start using the code, there will be no
>>>> way back.  Lars, WDYT?

A shorter name would be nice, yes.

>>> As Po said, there is a package already using the ts prefix and that
>>> package is popular enough. Maybe tsr? Anyway, I’d love a shorter
>>> prefix other than tree-sitter, it is a real pain to type this long
>>> prefix.
>> 
>> Then tsitter, perhaps?
>
> LGTM

Fine by me.  Or...  is tsit taken?

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no