[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: master 81886aeaff 1/2: Implement alternative sub-buffer support in t
|
From: |
Lars Ingebrigtsen |
|
Subject: |
Re: master 81886aeaff 1/2: Implement alternative sub-buffer support in term.el |
|
Date: |
Tue, 25 Jan 2022 12:52:19 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Po Lu <luangruo@yahoo.com> writes:
> Did this really have to be an incompatible change? What would hurt
> about leaving the option at `nil' by default?
Most terminals behave this way (by default), so it makes sense that `M-x
term' also do that (by default).
> Also, it's not really appropriate to use the term "TUI" here, because
> some people don't know what it refers to. It would be better to say
> "console" instead.
I've now changed it to "terminal".
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no