Re: Development Speed

[Po Lu]

Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org> writes:

>   > Over the years, we've managed to reduce the use of macros (replaced by
>   > inlinable functions) to some extent, partly thanks to improvement in
>   > compilers, but it didn't change much to the code overall.

> Why are inlinable functions superior to macros in regard to ease of
> understanding the code?  I don't see how they help.

+1