[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: move_it_vertically_backward question
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: move_it_vertically_backward question |
Date: |
Thu, 23 Dec 2021 12:39:06 +0200 |
> From: Po Lu <luangruo@yahoo.com>
> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2021 18:29:24 +0800
>
> > In principle, the offset could be a bignum or even a float, so the
> > restriction here seems to be too stringent, no? A float in particular
> > could be useful, I think, in case the caller calculated the pixels as
> > a float.
>
> I don't think that's consistent with everywhere else we accept a pixel
> value (for example, posn-at-x-y).
So you'd rather have the caller convert the value? I won't insist,
but the price of supporting float values is very low.
- Re: move_it_vertically_backward question, (continued)
- Re: move_it_vertically_backward question, Po Lu, 2021/12/19
- Re: move_it_vertically_backward question, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/12/19
- Re: move_it_vertically_backward question, Po Lu, 2021/12/19
- Re: move_it_vertically_backward question, Po Lu, 2021/12/21
- Re: move_it_vertically_backward question, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/12/21
- Re: move_it_vertically_backward question, Po Lu, 2021/12/21
- Re: move_it_vertically_backward question, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/12/22
- Re: move_it_vertically_backward question, Po Lu, 2021/12/22
- Re: move_it_vertically_backward question, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/12/23
- Re: move_it_vertically_backward question, Po Lu, 2021/12/23
- Re: move_it_vertically_backward question,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: move_it_vertically_backward question, Po Lu, 2021/12/23
- Re: move_it_vertically_backward question, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/12/23
- Re: move_it_vertically_backward question, Po Lu, 2021/12/23