Re: move_it_vertically_backward question

[Po Lu]

Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:

> Does the code DTRT in your use cases, and is it OK performance-wise to
> consider it stable enough for master?

Thanks, I fixed the other issues you pointed out, and yes, it works very
well.

> In principle, the offset could be a bignum or even a float, so the
> restriction here seems to be too stringent, no?  A float in particular
> could be useful, I think, in case the caller calculated the pixels as
> a float.

I don't think that's consistent with everywhere else we accept a pixel
value (for example, posn-at-x-y).

Thanks.