Re: matlab in ELPA (or tree) part II: are all requirements fulfilled?

[Uwe Brauer]

>>> "EZ" == Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:

>> From: Uwe Brauer <oub@mat.ucm.es>
>> Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2021 17:50:12 +0100
>> 
>> 1. The patches: I thought they were self explaining in the sense
>> that the files I want you to check are specified in theses
>> patches. So the question is simply: are my conclusions correct
>> concerning the patches?

> Where are the patches you want us to check?  And where are the
> conclusions you want us to review?

>> 2. The patches mentioned in the ChangeLog files, namely ChangeLog.old1
>> and  ChangeLog.old2. In these files you find patches mentioned for which
>> we don't have git commits, therefore I cannot produce patches and
>> I am not  sure, how to proceed.

> The files ChangeLog.old1 and ChangeLog.old2 are large and list a lot
> of changes.  Where do I find there "patches mentioned for which we
> don't have git commits"?

> I'm really confused, and these are good-faith questions: I don't
> understand what specifically did you want us to help you with.

> Maybe preparing a separate document, which would list the problems you
> have left one by one, with the necessary details, would help us
> understand what kind of help we could provide.

Ok, I hoped copyright.org would be self explaining. I see it is not. I
will try to add more information, and when I think I am finished I push
and let you know, all right?

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature