[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Correct byte compiler error/warning positions. The solution!
From: |
Alan Mackenzie |
Subject: |
Re: Correct byte compiler error/warning positions. The solution! |
Date: |
Fri, 17 Dec 2021 11:54:25 +0000 |
Hello, Andrea.
On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 09:33:45 +0000, Andrea Corallo wrote:
> Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de> writes:
[ .... ]
> > I have a problem at the moment, which could be a big problem. How do I
> > refer to a Lisp variable from jit generated code?
> > In particular, I need read-access to symbols-with-pos-enabled, or more
> > precisely to globals.f_symbols_with_pos_enabled.
[ .... ]
> > I tried declaring "globals" as a global variable to be imported into jit
> > space, but the loader doesn't know about "globals".
> > So, how can I get access to globals.f_symbols_with_pos_enabled?
> > Thanks in advance!
> Hi Alan,
> I think the way should be done is that one declare in the .eln a global
> variable as a (bool *), say 'f_symbols_with_pos_enabled_ref'. Then
> during eln load time we set into that the correct address of
> 'globals.f_symbols_with_pos_enabled' so it can be used as
> '*f_symbols_with_pos_enabled_ref' by the generated code.
Thanks, I have done this, and have thus progressed further. It is a
shame we need the extra indirection, but it shouldn't cost too much in
run time.
By the way, congratulations on using three stars in the declaration
struct thread_state ***current_thread_reloc;. That's not something one
sees very often. :-)
> We do something very similar for the Emacs global var 'current_thread'.
> In the eln we have a global variable named "current_thread_reloc" where
> we store the address of 'current_thread'. You can see we set this value
> during eln load in 'load_comp_unit'.
> Just grep CURRENT_THREAD_RELOC_SYM and you should find the relevant
> pieces of code you are interested in.
Done.
I now have another problem, and that's when bootstrap-emacs is trying to
load comp.{el,elc,eln} (I'm not sure which), and is in the (defconst
comp-known-func-cstr-h ...). The (Lisp) backtrace I see looks like this:
Debugger entered--Lisp error: (error "Attempt to modify read-only object"
--cl-block-comp-cstr-union-1-no-mem--)
comp-cstr-union-1-no-mem(t #s(comp-cstr :typeset (number) :valset nil :range
nil :neg nil) #s(comp-cstr :typeset (marker) :valset nil :range nil :neg nil))
comp-cstr-union-1(t #s(comp-cstr :typeset (t) :valset nil :range nil :neg
nil) #s(comp-cstr :typeset (number) :valset nil :range nil :neg nil)
#s(comp-cstr :typeset (marker) :valset nil :range nil :neg nil))
comp-cstr-union(#s(comp-cstr :typeset (t) :valset nil :range nil :neg nil)
#s(comp-cstr :typeset (number) :valset nil :range nil :neg nil) #s(comp-cstr
:typeset (marker) :valset nil :range nil :neg nil))
comp-cstr-union-make(#s(comp-cstr :typeset (number) :valset nil :range nil
:neg nil) #s(comp-cstr :typeset (marker) :valset nil :range nil :neg nil))
comp-type-spec-to-cstr((or number marker) t)
#<subr F616e6f6e796d6f75732d6c616d626461_anonymous_lambda_51>((or number
marker))
comp-type-spec-to-cstr((function ((or number marker) (or number marker))
number))
byte-code("\302
\30\303\304\305\"\11\306\211\211\211\211\5:\2038\0\5@\262\3\2\211A\262\4\242\262\5\2@\262\4\307\4!\262\2\310\5\3\6\11#\210\5A\262\6..."
[comp-ctxt comp-known-type-specifiers make-comp-cstr-ctxt make-hash-table
:test eq ni\l comp-type-spec-to-cstr puthash] 11)
(defconst comp-known-func-cstr-h (byte-code "\302
\30\303\304\305\"\11\306\211\211\211\211\5:\2038\0\5@\262\3\2\211A\262\4\242\262\5\2@\262\4\307\4!\262\2\310\5\3\6\11#\210\5A\262\6..."
[comp-ctxt comp-known-type-specifiers make-comp-cst\r-ctxt make-hash-table
:test eq nil comp-type-spec-to-cstr puthash] 11) "Hash table function ->
`comp-constraint'.")
load("comp" nil t)
The error seems to mean there was an attempt to write into pure memory,
and that the thing being written was the cl-block tag generated by the
(cl-defun comp-cstr-union-1-no-mem ...).
I thought I'd traced it to the `setcdr' form in cl--block-throw (in
cl-macs.el), but when I tried commenting out the CHECK_IMPURE test from
Fsetcdr (in data.c), I still got the same error and backtrace.
Would you help me with this error, please. Thanks!
> Best Regards
> Andrea
--
Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).
- Re: Correct byte compiler error/warning positions. The solution!, (continued)
- Re: Correct byte compiler error/warning positions. The solution!, Andrea Corallo, 2021/12/02
- Re: Correct byte compiler error/warning positions. The solution!, Alan Mackenzie, 2021/12/02
- Re: Correct byte compiler error/warning positions. The solution!, Alan Mackenzie, 2021/12/03
- Re: Correct byte compiler error/warning positions. The solution!, Andrea Corallo, 2021/12/04
- Re: Correct byte compiler error/warning positions. The solution!, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/12/04
- Re: Correct byte compiler error/warning positions. The solution!, Andrea Corallo, 2021/12/04
- Re: Correct byte compiler error/warning positions. The solution!, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/12/04
- Re: Correct byte compiler error/warning positions. The solution!, Andrea Corallo, 2021/12/04
- Re: Correct byte compiler error/warning positions. The solution!, Alan Mackenzie, 2021/12/14
- Re: Correct byte compiler error/warning positions. The solution!, Andrea Corallo, 2021/12/15
- Re: Correct byte compiler error/warning positions. The solution!,
Alan Mackenzie <=
- Re: Correct byte compiler error/warning positions. The solution!, Andrea Corallo, 2021/12/20
- Re: Correct byte compiler error/warning positions. The solution!, Alan Mackenzie, 2021/12/21
Re: Correct byte compiler error/warning positions. The solution!, Andrea Corallo, 2021/12/01