emacs-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Native compiler - passing command line options to C compiler


From: Andrea Corallo
Subject: Re: Native compiler - passing command line options to C compiler
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2021 15:38:44 +0000
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux)

Arthur Miller <arthur.miller@live.com> writes:

> Andrea Corallo <akrl@sdf.org> writes:
>
>> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>>
>>>> From: Andrea Corallo <akrl@sdf.org>
>>>> Cc: Arthur Miller <arthur.miller@live.com>, emacs-devel@gnu.org
>>>> Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2021 12:59:45 +0000
>>>> 
>>>> I think this "defined (WINDOWSNT)" should be there so that compiling on
>>>> Windows the check over "gcc_jit_context_add_command_line_option" it is
>>>> always compiled even in case the libgccjit.h provided at compile time
>>>> does not define
>>>> 'LIBGCCJIT_HAVE_gcc_jit_context_add_command_line_option'.
>>>> 
>>>> A newer version of the shared library including the entry point might be
>>>> provided later on and will be used at runtime.
>>>
>>> You cannot use a libgccjit.dll of a version for which Emacs was not
>>> compiled, unless it is binary-compatible.  If Emacs was linked against
>>> libgccjit.dll that didn't support
>>> gcc_jit_context_add_command_line_option, then it would not work to
>>> install a newer version of the DLL that does.
>>
>> Okay, I thought on Windows worked differently and we could handle the
>> case of a symbol not available at compile time but at runtime.  In the
>> light of this we can probably perform some more clean-up.
>
> So does that mean that windows check is not needed in add_driver_options as 
> well?

AFAIR that was the reason for that check so yes.

  Andrea



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]