[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [External] : Re: Dired C idea
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
RE: [External] : Re: Dired C idea |
Date: |
Mon, 2 Aug 2021 01:41:29 +0000 |
>> Should be feasible. The hard part is a rule to determine, whether rsync
>> is better suited than the existing implementation, with the given actual
>> arguments. I suspect, that small directories and/or short files are
>> better served with the current implementation.
>
> Do we really need to decide this? Wouldn't it be ok to use rsync
> for all cases (where Tramp is not in use)?
Based on your other mail on the subject today, aren't
you really asking "Wouldn't it be preferable...?"
instead of "Wouldn't it be OK...?"
- Re: Dired C idea, Michael Albinus, 2021/08/01
- Re: Dired C idea, Richard Stallman, 2021/08/01
- RE: [External] : Re: Dired C idea,
Drew Adams <=
- Re: Dired C idea, Michael Albinus, 2021/08/02
- Re: Dired C idea, Michael Albinus, 2021/08/03
- Re: Dired C idea, Gregory Heytings, 2021/08/03
- RE: [External] : Re: Dired C idea, Drew Adams, 2021/08/03
- Re: [External] : Re: Dired C idea, Pankaj Jangid, 2021/08/04
- RE: [External] : Re: Dired C idea, Drew Adams, 2021/08/04
- Re: Dired C idea, Arthur Miller, 2021/08/03
- Re: Dired C idea, Gregory Heytings, 2021/08/03
- Re: Dired C idea, Stefan Monnier, 2021/08/03
- Re: Dired C idea, Andreas Schwab, 2021/08/04