[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [External] : Re: Dired C idea
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
RE: [External] : Re: Dired C idea |
Date: |
Sat, 31 Jul 2021 20:56:41 +0000 |
> Should we replace cp with rsync or should we add rsync as an
> option/additional command? Not sure what the impact of rsync
> might be with simpler cp operations.
How about adding it, and if it turns out to be good
then give it a different key binding, leaving `C' as
it is?
But perhaps I don't understand the suggestion well.
If this behavior is added, is there really no longer
any use for the current `C' behavior? IOW, why would
this _replace_ that?
- Dired C idea, Richard Stallman, 2021/07/30
- RE: [External] : Re: Dired C idea,
Drew Adams <=
Re: Dired C idea, Michael Albinus, 2021/07/31