[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Cleaning up rcirc
From: |
Philip Kaludercic |
Subject: |
Re: Cleaning up rcirc |
Date: |
Fri, 04 Jun 2021 18:09:33 +0000 |
Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org> writes:
> On Jun 04 2021, Philip Kaludercic wrote:
>
>> @@ -846,6 +898,7 @@ rcirc-send-ctcp
>> (let ((args (if args (concat " " args) "")))
>> (rcirc-send-privmsg process target
>> (format "\C-a%s%s\C-a" request args))))
>> + "Send TARGET a REQUEST via PROCESS."
>>
>> (defun rcirc-buffer-process (&optional buffer)
>> "Return the process associated with channel BUFFER.
>
> That looks like a pasto.
Hmm, I wrote most of the code then tried to selectively separate out
each change into it's own commit. Must have added that docstring at the
wrong point...
Either way, I also noticed there were other issues with the code, that I
have since fixed. Would it be ok to push the changes as a feature
branch, so that I don't have to re-send all the patches again and again?
> Andreas.
--
Philip K.
- Cleaning up rcirc, Philip Kaludercic, 2021/06/04
- Re: Cleaning up rcirc, Andreas Schwab, 2021/06/04
- Re: Cleaning up rcirc,
Philip Kaludercic <=
- Re: Cleaning up rcirc, Tassilo Horn, 2021/06/06
- Re: Cleaning up rcirc, Philip Kaludercic, 2021/06/06
- Re: Cleaning up rcirc, Philip Kaludercic, 2021/06/10
- Re: Cleaning up rcirc, Tassilo Horn, 2021/06/10
- Re: Cleaning up rcirc, Philip Kaludercic, 2021/06/10
- Re: Cleaning up rcirc, Tassilo Horn, 2021/06/11
- Re: Cleaning up rcirc, Tassilo Horn, 2021/06/11
- Re: Cleaning up rcirc, Philip Kaludercic, 2021/06/11
- Re: Cleaning up rcirc, Tassilo Horn, 2021/06/11
- Re: Cleaning up rcirc, Philip Kaludercic, 2021/06/11