[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Proposal for an improved `help-for-help'
From: |
Stefan Kangas |
Subject: |
Re: Proposal for an improved `help-for-help' |
Date: |
Thu, 8 Apr 2021 05:57:46 -0700 |
Howard Melman <hmelman@gmail.com> writes:
>>>> R Show given manual
>>>
>>> For w above you say "a given command" maybe these two
>>> should match?
>>
>> Eli suggested "Show specified command", which I think is okay. I'm not
^^^^^^^^^ specific
>> sure they should match as they are far apart, and IMHO they read a bit
>> better this way.
>
> I prefer the word "specified" too. I don't think their
> distance makes any difference. I'd used specified in both places.
OK, I'm going with:
"Show which key runs a specific command"
"Show a specific manual"
>>>> S Find symbol in Info manual for current programming language
Eli suggested "Show description of symbol in pertinent manual".
> I was just referring to it use in "Debugging GNU Emacs". I
> think that should be "Debugging Emacs". The "GNU" should stay
> in "(GNU General Public License)" and also in the warranty
> description.
Oh, right. Yes, that makes more sense; removed.
- Re: DEL vs Backspace, (continued)
Re: Proposal for an improved `help-for-help', Gregory Heytings, 2021/04/24
Re: Proposal for an improved `help-for-help', Howard Melman, 2021/04/07
Re: Proposal for an improved `help-for-help', Dmitry Gutov, 2021/04/25
Re: Proposal for an improved `help-for-help', Stefan Kangas, 2021/04/25