[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: extraclean and admin/grammars [was Re: Git master head build failure
From: |
Lars Ingebrigtsen |
Subject: |
Re: extraclean and admin/grammars [was Re: Git master head build failure?] |
Date: |
Sun, 04 Apr 2021 21:44:06 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>> I still don't understand what mean here, since it's been demonstrated
>> several times that (in certain circumstances) people have to say "make
>> extraclean" to build a working Emacs executable.
>
> "make extraclean" is only needed when doing something very drastic,
> like switching to a very different branch. That is an extremely rare
> (if not improbable) use case, so IMO having everyone pay for it is
> unjustified.
It doesn't seem like we're going to get any further here? My opinion is
that "make bootstrap" should guarantee a build (to the best of our
abilities). Yours is that it shouldn't.
I don't have the stamina to debate the issue further.
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no
- Re: extraclean and admin/grammars [was Re: Git master head build failure?], (continued)
- Re: extraclean and admin/grammars [was Re: Git master head build failure?], Eli Zaretskii, 2021/04/02
- Re: extraclean and admin/grammars [was Re: Git master head build failure?], Eli Zaretskii, 2021/04/01
- Re: extraclean and admin/grammars [was Re: Git master head build failure?], Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/04/02
- Re: extraclean and admin/grammars [was Re: Git master head build failure?], Eli Zaretskii, 2021/04/02
- Re: extraclean and admin/grammars [was Re: Git master head build failure?], Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/04/03
- Re: extraclean and admin/grammars [was Re: Git master head build failure?], Eli Zaretskii, 2021/04/03
- Re: extraclean and admin/grammars [was Re: Git master head build failure?], chad, 2021/04/03
- Re: extraclean and admin/grammars [was Re: Git master head build failure?], Eli Zaretskii, 2021/04/04
- Re: extraclean and admin/grammars [was Re: Git master head build failure?], Tim Cross, 2021/04/03
- Re: extraclean and admin/grammars [was Re: Git master head build failure?], Eli Zaretskii, 2021/04/04
- Re: extraclean and admin/grammars [was Re: Git master head build failure?],
Lars Ingebrigtsen <=
- Re: extraclean and admin/grammars [was Re: Git master head build failure?], Stefan Monnier, 2021/04/01
- Re: extraclean and admin/grammars [was Re: Git master head build failure?], Eli Zaretskii, 2021/04/01
- Re: extraclean and admin/grammars [was Re: Git master head build failure?], Stefan Monnier, 2021/04/01
- Re: extraclean and admin/grammars [was Re: Git master head build failure?], Eli Zaretskii, 2021/04/03
- Re: extraclean and admin/grammars [was Re: Git master head build failure?], Stefan Monnier, 2021/04/12
- Re: extraclean and admin/grammars [was Re: Git master head build failure?], Eli Zaretskii, 2021/04/13
- Re: extraclean and admin/grammars [was Re: Git master head build failure?], Eli Zaretskii, 2021/04/13
- Re: extraclean and admin/grammars [was Re: Git master head build failure?], Stefan Monnier, 2021/04/13
- Re: extraclean and admin/grammars [was Re: Git master head build failure?], Stefan Monnier, 2021/04/13
- Re: extraclean and admin/grammars [was Re: Git master head build failure?], Eli Zaretskii, 2021/04/13