[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: scratch/command 064f146 1/2: Change command to interactive ... modes
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: scratch/command 064f146 1/2: Change command to interactive ... modes |
Date: |
Tue, 16 Feb 2021 21:39:31 +0200 |
> From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org>
> Cc: stefankangas@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, dgutov@yandex.ru
> Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2021 20:31:01 +0100
>
> > Yes, I disagree that the former is not clear, easy, and maintainable.
> > We've been using similar constructs for years.
>
> That's not quite a response to what I asked: Which one of those syntaxes
> are clearer and easier? (To read and to write.)
I find both to be of the same level of clarity and easiness of
reading and writing.
> I think it's clear that the new interactive spec leads to commands that
> are easier to read and write than if (virtually all) commands need a
> second (pretty obscure) incantation -- interactive/declare then works in
> concert, and you have to understand both.
I don't think an addition of a 'declare' form makes the function
harder to read, no.
Moreover, I believe many (most?) commands will remain unmarked,
because they make sense in any mode.
So I don't see any significant advantages in using 'interactive' for
this purpose, but I do see disadvantages.
- Re: scratch/command 064f146 1/2: Change command to interactive ... modes, (continued)
- Re: scratch/command 064f146 1/2: Change command to interactive ... modes, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/02/16
- Re: scratch/command 064f146 1/2: Change command to interactive ... modes, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/02/16
- Re: scratch/command 064f146 1/2: Change command to interactive ... modes, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/02/16
- Re: scratch/command 064f146 1/2: Change command to interactive ... modes, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/02/16
- Re: scratch/command 064f146 1/2: Change command to interactive ... modes, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/02/16
- Re: scratch/command 064f146 1/2: Change command to interactive ... modes, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/02/16
- Re: scratch/command 064f146 1/2: Change command to interactive ... modes, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/02/16
- Re: scratch/command 064f146 1/2: Change command to interactive ... modes, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/02/16
- Re: scratch/command 064f146 1/2: Change command to interactive ... modes, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/02/16
- Re: scratch/command 064f146 1/2: Change command to interactive ... modes, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/02/16
- Re: scratch/command 064f146 1/2: Change command to interactive ... modes,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: scratch/command 064f146 1/2: Change command to interactive ... modes, Stefan Kangas, 2021/02/16
- Re: scratch/command 064f146 1/2: Change command to interactive ... modes, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/02/16
- Re: scratch/command 064f146 1/2: Change command to interactive ... modes, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/02/16
- Re: scratch/command 064f146 1/2: Change command to interactive ... modes, Dmitry Gutov, 2021/02/16
- Re: scratch/command 064f146 1/2: Change command to interactive ... modes, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/02/16
- Re: scratch/command 064f146 1/2: Change command to interactive ... modes, Dmitry Gutov, 2021/02/16
- Re: scratch/command 064f146 1/2: Change command to interactive ... modes, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/02/17
- Re: scratch/command 064f146 1/2: Change command to interactive ... modes, Dmitry Gutov, 2021/02/17
- Re: scratch/command 064f146 1/2: Change command to interactive ... modes, Juri Linkov, 2021/02/17
- Re: scratch/command 064f146 1/2: Change command to interactive ... modes, Stefan Kangas, 2021/02/17