[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: scratch/command 064f146 1/2: Change command to interactive ... modes
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: scratch/command 064f146 1/2: Change command to interactive ... modes |
Date: |
Tue, 16 Feb 2021 20:24:55 +0200 |
> From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org>
> Cc: stefankangas@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, dgutov@yandex.ru
> Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2021 19:10:01 +0100
>
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>
> > Looking at it from another aspect: don't you agree that the
> > alternative solutions are less intrusive? They introduce neither new
> > syntax nor new semantics, they just use existing facilities. Thus,
> > those alternatives don't increase complexity as much as the new arg of
> > 'interactive'. It is advantageous to have a solution with less
> > complexity.
>
> But that's a different discussion.
>
> I take it that the conclusion to the question I asked ("is there a point
> to having the .elc files be compatible when the .el files aren't?") is
> "no, there's no point in that".
>
> Are we in agreement on that?
No, we are not.
> The other question you're now re-asking is: Does it make sense to
> introduce a new `interactive' form?
>
> And I've argued that point repeatedly, and I don't really wish to repeat
> myself. I can do so if you think it would help, though -- just let me
> know.
I just cannot understand why you insist on this solution as the only
one, when there are others that can do the job without the downsides.
Is "compromise" a dirty word or something?
- Re: scratch/command 064f146 1/2: Change command to interactive ... modes, (continued)
- Re: scratch/command 064f146 1/2: Change command to interactive ... modes, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/02/14
- Re: scratch/command 064f146 1/2: Change command to interactive ... modes, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/02/16
- Re: scratch/command 064f146 1/2: Change command to interactive ... modes, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/02/16
- Re: scratch/command 064f146 1/2: Change command to interactive ... modes, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/02/16
- Re: scratch/command 064f146 1/2: Change command to interactive ... modes, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/02/16
- Re: scratch/command 064f146 1/2: Change command to interactive ... modes, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/02/16
- Re: scratch/command 064f146 1/2: Change command to interactive ... modes, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/02/16
- Re: scratch/command 064f146 1/2: Change command to interactive ... modes, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/02/16
- Re: scratch/command 064f146 1/2: Change command to interactive ... modes, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/02/16
- Re: scratch/command 064f146 1/2: Change command to interactive ... modes, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/02/16
- Re: scratch/command 064f146 1/2: Change command to interactive ... modes,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: scratch/command 064f146 1/2: Change command to interactive ... modes, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/02/16
- Re: scratch/command 064f146 1/2: Change command to interactive ... modes, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/02/16
- Re: scratch/command 064f146 1/2: Change command to interactive ... modes, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/02/16
- Re: scratch/command 064f146 1/2: Change command to interactive ... modes, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/02/16
- Re: scratch/command 064f146 1/2: Change command to interactive ... modes, Stefan Kangas, 2021/02/16
- Re: scratch/command 064f146 1/2: Change command to interactive ... modes, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/02/16
- Re: scratch/command 064f146 1/2: Change command to interactive ... modes, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/02/16
- Re: scratch/command 064f146 1/2: Change command to interactive ... modes, Dmitry Gutov, 2021/02/16
- Re: scratch/command 064f146 1/2: Change command to interactive ... modes, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/02/16
- Re: scratch/command 064f146 1/2: Change command to interactive ... modes, Dmitry Gutov, 2021/02/16