[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Concern about new binding.
From: |
Sean Whitton |
Subject: |
Re: Concern about new binding. |
Date: |
Mon, 15 Feb 2021 11:15:05 -0700 |
Hello,
On Tue 09 Feb 2021 at 03:22PM -08, Karthik Chikmagalur wrote:
> Is the rationale for choosing `C-x x' as the prefix for buffer related
> commands merely that `C-x g' is popular among magit users? Neither `C-x
> g' nor `C-x x' are mnemonic for buffer-related commands, though. I can
> think of a couple of alternatives, including `C-x M-b' as the prefix for
> buffer commands. If there's a decision to add similar file-related
> keybindings in the future (`rename-file', etc), it can neatly slot into
> a `C-x M-f' keymap.
>
> A secondary issue is the choice of keys in ctl-x-x-map:
>
> 1. `C-x x n': clone-buffer
>
> Shouldn't this be `C-x x c' for consistency with the similar binding for
> `clone-indirect-buffer-other-window' (`C-x 4 c')? The two commands are
> even bound five lines apart in lisp/bindings.el!
Indirect clones and non-indirect clones are quite different.
There is already a convention to use 'n' for a non-indirect clone -- see
M-n in Info-mode.
--
Sean Whitton
- Re: Concern about new binding., (continued)
- Re: Concern about new binding., Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/02/07
- Re: Concern about new binding., Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/02/07
- Re: Concern about new binding., Ergus, 2021/02/07
- Re: Concern about new binding., Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/02/07
- Re: Concern about new binding., Teemu Likonen, 2021/02/08
- RE: [External] : Re: Concern about new binding., Drew Adams, 2021/02/07
- Re: [External] : Re: Concern about new binding., Ergus, 2021/02/07
- RE: [External] : Re: Concern about new binding., Drew Adams, 2021/02/07
- Re: [External] : Re: Concern about new binding., Alfred M. Szmidt, 2021/02/10
- Re: Concern about new binding., Karthik Chikmagalur, 2021/02/09
- Re: Concern about new binding.,
Sean Whitton <=
- Re: Concern about new binding., Karthik Chikmagalur, 2021/02/15
- Re: Concern about new binding., Sean Whitton, 2021/02/16
- Re: Concern about new binding., Dmitry Gutov, 2021/02/05
- Re: Concern about new binding., Jose A. Ortega Ruiz, 2021/02/04
- RE: [External] : Re: Concern about new binding., Drew Adams, 2021/02/04
- Re: [External] : Re: Concern about new binding., Richard Stallman, 2021/02/05
- Re: Concern about new binding., Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/02/05
- Re: Concern about new binding., jao, 2021/02/05
- Re: Concern about new binding., Sean Whitton, 2021/02/04
- 28.0.50; Move revert-buffer global binding into a prefix map, Sean Whitton, 2021/02/04