[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Concern about new binding.
From: |
Lars Ingebrigtsen |
Subject: |
Re: Concern about new binding. |
Date: |
Thu, 04 Feb 2021 11:25:26 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Gregory Heytings <gregory@heytings.org> writes:
> I misunderstood what you said indeed. I think asking before doing
> anything would be okay, but I guess in that case it would be necessary
> to introduce an "undo-outer-outer-limit" at, say, 250 MB, above which
> it would not be possible to keep the undo info.
Ideally, we could ask "this action will take <foo> MB; really do it?",
and we won't need any new variable.
But like I said, I don't know how feasible this is to ask before the
doing the action.
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no
- Re: Concern about new binding., (continued)
- Re: Concern about new binding., Sean Whitton, 2021/02/03
- Re: Concern about new binding., Richard Stallman, 2021/02/04
- Re: Concern about new binding., Gregory Heytings, 2021/02/04
- Re: Concern about new binding., Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/02/04
- Re: Concern about new binding., Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/02/04
- Re: Concern about new binding., Gregory Heytings, 2021/02/04
- Re: Concern about new binding., Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/02/04
- Re: Concern about new binding., Gregory Heytings, 2021/02/04
- Re: Concern about new binding.,
Lars Ingebrigtsen <=
- Re: Concern about new binding., Gregory Heytings, 2021/02/04
- Re: Concern about new binding., Eli Zaretskii, 2021/02/04
- Re: Concern about new binding., Eli Zaretskii, 2021/02/04
- Re: Concern about new binding., Gregory Heytings, 2021/02/04