[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Concern about new binding.
From: |
Lars Ingebrigtsen |
Subject: |
Re: Concern about new binding. |
Date: |
Thu, 04 Feb 2021 11:10:20 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Gregory Heytings <gregory@heytings.org> writes:
>> Or... if it could offer to to keep the undo info, even if it's over
>> the current general limit, that would be even nicer, perhaps?
>
> I don't have strong feelings about this. Perhaps offering to keep the
> undo info after the command has been executed would be nicer indeed.
> But not executing the command before a confirmation is perhaps less
> risky.
I was thinking about asking before doing anything, if that's practically
possible, but I haven't looked at the code.
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no
- Re: Concern about new binding., (continued)
- Re: Concern about new binding., Sean Whitton, 2021/02/03
- Re: Concern about new binding., Richard Stallman, 2021/02/04
- Re: Concern about new binding., Gregory Heytings, 2021/02/04
- Re: Concern about new binding., Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/02/04
- Re: Concern about new binding., Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/02/04
- Re: Concern about new binding., Gregory Heytings, 2021/02/04
- Re: Concern about new binding.,
Lars Ingebrigtsen <=
- Re: Concern about new binding., Gregory Heytings, 2021/02/04
- Re: Concern about new binding., Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/02/04
- Re: Concern about new binding., Gregory Heytings, 2021/02/04
- Re: Concern about new binding., Eli Zaretskii, 2021/02/04
- Re: Concern about new binding., Eli Zaretskii, 2021/02/04
- Re: Concern about new binding., Gregory Heytings, 2021/02/04