[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Concern about new binding.
From: |
martin rudalics |
Subject: |
Re: Concern about new binding. |
Date: |
Wed, 3 Feb 2021 12:06:30 +0100 |
> I think M-g is for "goto" actions.
Then let's change the semantics of "g".
> What we have here are "buffer"
> actions. IMO it is better to put them on separate keymaps. The
> exception is C-x r, which is used for registers, rectangles and
> bookmarks, which is IMO confusing.
Isn't it a bit ridiculous to desperately search for free keybindings for
one given prefix while another prefix offers them for free?
martin
- Re: Concern about new binding., (continued)
Re: Concern about new binding., martin rudalics, 2021/02/03
Re: Concern about new binding., Richard Stallman, 2021/02/03
- Re: Concern about new binding., Gregory Heytings, 2021/02/03
- Re: Concern about new binding., Robert Pluim, 2021/02/03
- Re: Concern about new binding., Alfred M. Szmidt, 2021/02/03
- Re: Concern about new binding., Andreas Schwab, 2021/02/03
- Re: Concern about new binding., Alfred M. Szmidt, 2021/02/03
- Re: Concern about new binding., Andreas Schwab, 2021/02/03
- Re: Concern about new binding., Alfred M. Szmidt, 2021/02/03
- Re: Concern about new binding., Thibaut Verron, 2021/02/03