[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Concern about new binding.
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Concern about new binding. |
Date: |
Wed, 03 Feb 2021 00:52:10 -0500 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> In a recent commit I see that the C-x g binding was taken for
> revert-buffer.
I see another disadvantage in that binding: revert-buffer is a drastic
operation, so we should not make it easier. I think it is wiser
not to put it on a key -- which is why I never did.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org)
Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)
- Re: [External] : Re: Concern about new binding., (continued)
Re: Concern about new binding., Ergus, 2021/02/02
Re: Concern about new binding., martin rudalics, 2021/02/03
Re: Concern about new binding.,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: Concern about new binding., Gregory Heytings, 2021/02/03
- Re: Concern about new binding., Robert Pluim, 2021/02/03
- Re: Concern about new binding., Alfred M. Szmidt, 2021/02/03
- Re: Concern about new binding., Andreas Schwab, 2021/02/03
- Re: Concern about new binding., Alfred M. Szmidt, 2021/02/03
- Re: Concern about new binding., Andreas Schwab, 2021/02/03
- Re: Concern about new binding., Alfred M. Szmidt, 2021/02/03
- Re: Concern about new binding., Thibaut Verron, 2021/02/03
- Re: Concern about new binding., Eli Zaretskii, 2021/02/03
- Re: Concern about new binding., Dmitry Gutov, 2021/02/03