[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: NonGNU ELPA
From: |
Jean Louis |
Subject: |
Re: NonGNU ELPA |
Date: |
Mon, 26 Oct 2020 13:35:16 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/+ (1036f0e) (2020-10-18) |
* Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org> [2020-10-26 07:11]:
> One question is, when we need to make our own changes in a package,
> should we do those changes in NonGNU ELPA's repo itself,
> or should we make a separate Savannah repo for our version of the package
> so that NonGNU ELPA's is never anything but a mirror?
- if there is emergency for change, such should be made first non
NonGNU ELPA, and followed by notice or issue to the original
author. As each package is supposed to have name and maybe email
address, that should be preferred way, rather than asking users to
sign up on Github through non-free Javascript. Emergency can be if
the packages breaks some other packages or some safety reasons, as
many users would be eventually accessing the NonGNU ELPA.
- if there is no emergency, changes shall be collaborated with the
author, if there is no author, then maintainer
- if there is no way to neither collaborate with the author, or
maintainer, then comes the change in the NonGNU ELPA
- Re: NonGNU ELPA, (continued)
- Re: NonGNU ELPA and release frequency, Richard Stallman, 2020/10/24
- Re: NonGNU ELPA and release frequency, Dmitry Gutov, 2020/10/25
- Re: NonGNU ELPA and release frequency, Stefan Monnier, 2020/10/25
- Re: NonGNU ELPA and release frequency, Ivan Yonchovski, 2020/10/25
- Re: NonGNU ELPA and release frequency, Antoine Kalmbach, 2020/10/25
- Re: NonGNU ELPA and release frequency, Richard Stallman, 2020/10/26
- Re: NonGNU ELPA,
Jean Louis <=
- Re: NonGNU ELPA, Richard Stallman, 2020/10/26
- Re: NonGNU ELPA and release frequency, Dmitry Gutov, 2020/10/26
- Re: NonGNU ELPA and release frequency, Richard Stallman, 2020/10/26
- Re: NonGNU ELPA and release frequency, Richard Stallman, 2020/10/24
Re: NonGNU ELPA and release frequency, Stefan Monnier, 2020/10/24