[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Lightweight, C-only implementation of Emacs
From: |
Daniele Nicolodi |
Subject: |
Re: Lightweight, C-only implementation of Emacs |
Date: |
Mon, 3 Aug 2020 19:24:11 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.11.0 |
On 03/08/2020 17:56, Amin Bandali wrote:
> In the specific case of Zile, having now looked through the issue
> referenced earlier, <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?58880>, I see the
> maintainer mentioning that "Zile still has users, so I maintain it for
> them", which is great news :-).
Are you sure this does not fall into the "I am very tired of supporting
this piece of software, but I continue doing so for spirit of service
toward those (hopefully few) that still depend on it" category?
Cheers,
Dan
- Re: Lightweight, C-only implementation of Emacs, Jeffrey Walton, 2020/08/03
- Re: Lightweight, C-only implementation of Emacs, Ulrich Mueller, 2020/08/03
- Re: Lightweight, C-only implementation of Emacs, Jeffrey Walton, 2020/08/03
- Re: Lightweight, C-only implementation of Emacs, Ulrich Mueller, 2020/08/03
- Re: Lightweight, C-only implementation of Emacs, Jeffrey Walton, 2020/08/03
- Re: Lightweight, C-only implementation of Emacs, Stefan Monnier, 2020/08/03
- Re: Lightweight, C-only implementation of Emacs, Gregory Heytings, 2020/08/03
- Re: Lightweight, C-only implementation of Emacs, Amin Bandali, 2020/08/03
- Re: Lightweight, C-only implementation of Emacs, Daniele Nicolodi, 2020/08/03
- Re: Lightweight, C-only implementation of Emacs, Amin Bandali, 2020/08/03
- Re: Lightweight, C-only implementation of Emacs,
Daniele Nicolodi <=
- Re: Lightweight, C-only implementation of Emacs, andres . ramirez, 2020/08/03
- Re: Lightweight, C-only implementation of Emacs, Ergus, 2020/08/07