[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Lightweight, C-only implementation of Emacs
From: |
Jeffrey Walton |
Subject: |
Re: Lightweight, C-only implementation of Emacs |
Date: |
Mon, 3 Aug 2020 14:38:43 -0400 |
On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 1:36 AM Ulrich Mueller <ulm@gentoo.org> wrote:
> ...
> > I understand I will probably loose some functionality due to decoupling
> > Lisp.
>
> > Does anyone have a list of Emacs replacements?
>
> There is a list of Emacs implementations in the Gentoo wiki:
> https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Emacs/Emacs-like_editors
You should probably take Zile off the list or make a note it is not
recommended for use. According to Reuben Thomas, one of the Zile
maintainers (from Zile Issue 58880):
I consider Zile to be in maintenance mode. I do not
recommend it use, I will not be adding features ...
Jeff
- Re: Lightweight, C-only implementation of Emacs,
Jeffrey Walton <=
- Re: Lightweight, C-only implementation of Emacs, Ulrich Mueller, 2020/08/03
- Re: Lightweight, C-only implementation of Emacs, Jeffrey Walton, 2020/08/03
- Re: Lightweight, C-only implementation of Emacs, Ulrich Mueller, 2020/08/03
- Re: Lightweight, C-only implementation of Emacs, Jeffrey Walton, 2020/08/03
- Re: Lightweight, C-only implementation of Emacs, Stefan Monnier, 2020/08/03
- Re: Lightweight, C-only implementation of Emacs, Gregory Heytings, 2020/08/03
- Re: Lightweight, C-only implementation of Emacs, Amin Bandali, 2020/08/03
- Re: Lightweight, C-only implementation of Emacs, Daniele Nicolodi, 2020/08/03
- Re: Lightweight, C-only implementation of Emacs, Amin Bandali, 2020/08/03
- Re: Lightweight, C-only implementation of Emacs, Daniele Nicolodi, 2020/08/03