Re: shr.el rename?

[Richard Stallman]

[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider    ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies,     ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]

  > > I think the name html-render.el would be much better.
  > > Just seeing that in a directory listing, I would know what it does
  > > and I'd remember the name.

  > Alternatively, you could just learn what "shr" means -- I think that'd

I'm sorry if my words made it appear that I was concerned only with
whether I personally would remember the non-suggestive name "shr".
Renaming the package to a name that visibly fits what the package does
would be a cleanup that would make its meaning more obvious to
everyone.

Could we start renaming packages to meaningful, clear names when we
add them to Emacs or GNU ELPA?  We used to keep names short for MSDOS,
but that isn't necessary any more.

-- 
Dr Richard Stallman
Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org)
Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)