[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: GNU Emacs raison d'etre
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
RE: GNU Emacs raison d'etre |
Date: |
Sun, 17 May 2020 11:11:59 -0700 (PDT) |
> >>> Top positioning has either the same problem as near
> >>> point (your annoyance: obscuring info) or the same
> >>> problem as bottom-positioning.
> >> Agreed. Top positioning might be better for other
> >> reasons though.
> > What reasons?
>
> When the minibuffer is updated, and its height has to change, the
> bottom-positioned minibuffer will have to move its input area up.
> That's hella annoying.
Is it? Doesn't annoy me, and that's what I
use daily.
How is it worse than a minibuffer at screen
top extending its input area downward?
In any case, as I said, if you can put the
minibuffer at screen bottom then you can put
it at screen top - user choice. There's no
need to debate individual preferences or
annoyances in that regard.
- Re: GNU Emacs raison d'etre, (continued)
- RE: GNU Emacs raison d'etre, Drew Adams, 2020/05/17
- RE: GNU Emacs raison d'etre, Drew Adams, 2020/05/17
- RE: GNU Emacs raison d'etre, Drew Adams, 2020/05/17
- Re: GNU Emacs raison d'etre, Dmitry Gutov, 2020/05/17
- Re: GNU Emacs raison d'etre, Sergey Organov, 2020/05/17
- Re: GNU Emacs raison d'etre, Dmitry Gutov, 2020/05/17
- RE: GNU Emacs raison d'etre,
Drew Adams <=
- Re: GNU Emacs raison d'etre, Arthur Miller, 2020/05/16
- Re: GNU Emacs raison d'etre, Richard Stallman, 2020/05/16
- Re: GNU Emacs raison d'etre, Karl Fogel, 2020/05/28
- Re: GNU Emacs raison d'etre, Eduardo Ochs, 2020/05/28
- RE: GNU Emacs raison d'etre, Drew Adams, 2020/05/28
- RE: GNU Emacs raison d'etre, excalamus, 2020/05/28
- Re: GNU Emacs raison d'etre, Jean-Christophe Helary, 2020/05/28
- RE: GNU Emacs raison d'etre, Drew Adams, 2020/05/28
- Re: GNU Emacs raison d'etre, Jean-Christophe Helary, 2020/05/29
- Re: GNU Emacs raison d'etre, Philip K., 2020/05/28