> I really cannot wait till you get to renaming
> functions concerning lines: `line-...' or
> perhaps `lines-...'. And their aliases...
I must say I find this mildly offensive. It's basically a strawman argument.
All of us arguing in favor of structuring the namespace have made it
very clear we have no intention of applying this everywhere.
It's rather a (tongue-in-cheek, yes) argument by reduction to absurdity, which starts most validly from the premise of "consistency" in the opposing camp.
João
João