|
| From: | Drew Adams |
| Subject: | RE: Imports / inclusion of s.el into Emacs |
| Date: | Sat, 2 May 2020 11:07:57 -0700 (PDT) |
> If the name strpbrk speaks to your heart, more power to you. > > But let's not use it as an argument that function names don't need to > convey information. Let's not exaggerate. Has anyone argued against function names generally needing to convey info?
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |