[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [ELPA] New package: transient
|
From: |
Drew Adams |
|
Subject: |
RE: [ELPA] New package: transient |
|
Date: |
Wed, 29 Apr 2020 09:05:59 -0700 (PDT) |
> (after all, it's a classification job so it's
> both hard and impossible).
I love this. A wonderful formulation. To be cited.
Part of the impossibility being that there's no
reconciling lumpers & splitters, etc. (Not just
lumpers & splitters, of course - any differences
in classification.)
"both hard and impossible" - great point, really.
___
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lumpers_and_splitters
- Re: [ELPA] New package: transient, (continued)
- Re: [ELPA] New package: transient, Richard Stallman, 2020/04/29
- Re: [ELPA] New package: transient, Stefan Monnier, 2020/04/29
- Re: [ELPA] New package: transient, Philippe Vaucher, 2020/04/29
- Re: [ELPA] New package: transient, Yuan Fu, 2020/04/29
- Re: [ELPA] New package: transient, Yuan Fu, 2020/04/29
- Re: [ELPA] New package: transient, Richard Stallman, 2020/04/29
- Re: [ELPA] New package: transient, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/04/29
- Re: [ELPA] New package: transient, Stefan Monnier, 2020/04/29
- RE: [ELPA] New package: transient,
Drew Adams <=
- Re: [ELPA] New package: transient, Richard Stallman, 2020/04/29
- RE: [ELPA] New package: transient, Drew Adams, 2020/04/29
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: [ELPA] New package: transient, Adam Porter, 2020/04/29
Re: [ELPA] New package: transient, Richard Stallman, 2020/04/29
Re: [ELPA] New package: transient, Zhu Zihao, 2020/04/30