Re: master 8f0f851: * lisp/autoarg.el: Use lexical binding.

[Michael Heerdegen]

Drew Adams <address@hidden> writes:

> > > RESULT is good enough for Common Lisp.  Why isn't
> > > it good enough for Elisp?  Just curious.
> >
> > See the discussion in Bug#16206.
>
> I saw it.  I still have the same question.

Some people argued that RESULT is not so useful, and it's position in
the syntax is strange, and seems nobody really found this totally wrong.

BTW, in the discussion in said bug report we now found the idea to
always warn about using the RESULT argument in subr.el's dotimes (in
order to remove it later) and fix the warning in cl-dotimes.

Michael.