Re: Multiple definitions of explicit-shell-file-name

[Basil L. Contovounesios]

"Basil L. Contovounesios" <address@hidden> writes:

> Some followup questions in case this is a welcome change:
>
> 0. Does the user option's :version need to be bumped?
>
> 1. Does this change need to be called out in etc/NEWS?
>
> 2. I stuck with the 'shell' custom group as it's in the name of the user
>    option, is used by all other shell-related user options in simple.el,
>    and is I think where users were most likely to find the user option
>    until now.  Is that okay?

3. Should this go to master or emacs-27?  The changes are simple but not
   pressing (we've had the current situation for decades), so my guess
   is master.

-- 
Basil