Re: defvar without value

[Michael Heerdegen]

Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:

> > Ah - ok, this has already been added.  Eh - why again is there only
> > `dlet' expanding `let*' and no parallel version?
>
> In my experience it's very rare to need the "parallel" version.

If you are not 100% sure that we will never want it, I guess it would
make sense to rename the new macro to `dlet*' now so that if we ever
want a parallel version we don't have to call it `dlet*' then.

Michael.