[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: defvar without value
|
From: |
Emanuel Berg |
|
Subject: |
Re: defvar without value |
|
Date: |
Fri, 10 Apr 2020 01:34:53 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) |
Stefan Monnier wrote:
>> Ah - ok, this has already been added. Eh - why again
>> is there only `dlet' expanding `let*' and no
>> parallel version?
>
> In my experience it's very rare to need the
> "parallel" version.
You mean in this (dynamic) case, or never?
The supposedly parallel version isn't needed in my
experience if there is `let*', which there is, _but_ the
minimalist attitude of programming will make it look
wierd - hey, why is let* here, when there is no
dependent binding?
Maybe `let' will truly be parallel one day and then all
old software keeping a strict division between let and
let* will be rewarded :)
BOOM ... and they are just gone
--
underground experts united
http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573
https://dataswamp.org/~incal