Re: Windows and MacOS and emacs.html

[Bruno Félix Rezende Ribeiro]

Hello Richard,

Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:

> It appears that BSDs has already been listed there, which is 
> But I saw something that is not ok: the way that Windows and MacOS
> are given "top billing" too.
> [...]
> Would people please change emacs.html to avoid that impression?
> This approach could handle that.
>     Freedom-respesting operating systems:
>           GNU/Linux      BSDs
>       Freedom-denying operating systems:
>            Windows      MacOS
> [...]
> However, there is another problem there.
> [...]
> But if you follow the links "Windows" and "MacOS" at the top of the
> page, they take you straight to the subsections.  Users who follow
> that path get to the practical information without passing by any hint
> that we have moral criticism of those systems.
> [...]
> So I think we should make "Windows" and "MacOS" link to the
> "Nonfree systems" header line.

FWIW, both problems seem to have /not/ been addressed yet.

-- 
Bruno Félix Rezende Ribeiro (oitofelix) [0x28D618AF]
<http://oitofelix.freeshell.org/>

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature