Re: cl-defun vs defun (was: Should diff.elisp.xfuncname match cl-lib macros?)

[Richard Stallman]

[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider    ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies,     ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]

  > As described under "(cl) Argument Lists", cl-defun extends defun to
  > support CL argument lists (with default values for optional arguments,
  > keyword arguments, etc.)

Long ago, adding these features to Emacs would have been bloat and would
have caused problems for users.  But not nowadays.  So I see no reason
to oppose it.


-- 
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation (https://gnu.org, https://fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)